The two coordinate systems have the same spatial and temporal origin
(the point t=0, r=0 is the same as t′=0, r′=0), but
can be rotated with the rotation R. This homogeneous Galilean group
corresponds to the Lorentz group. The full Galilean group then also adds
spatial and temporal translations (and it corresponds to the Poincaré group),
but those cannot be expressed as 4x4 matrices. Expanding the equations out we
get:
Where the 6 parameters of the Lie group are the three rotation angles for the
rotation matrix R:
(ϕ1,ϕ2,ϕ3) and the components of the velocity
v=(v1,v2,v3). The corresponding 6 generators are:
The dots skip the tedious direct computation, but it can be done.
This transformation leaves invariant both the spatial contravariant metric
diag(0,1,1,1) and the independent dual temporal covariant metric
diag(1,0,0,0). This is computed below. The Lorentz/Poincaré group
leaves the Minkowski metric invariant and that is also computed below.
Furthermore, from the metric one can derive the transformation also.
The commutation relations (7) allow many representations of the
Galilean group.
We postulated the Galilean transformations above. But rather we actually want
to derive them from the principle of relativity. We start with A(u)A(v)=A(w)
and show that the transformations must for a Lie group. Then we derive all
possible groups from assuming isotropy of space. About 11+ groups. Then we
impose further conditions, for example homogeneity. Then we get just Galilean,
Lorentz O(3,1) and rotations O(4). Separately we use compactness in time, that
gets rid of O(4).
So we get Galilean and Lorentz, and we compute what metrics they satisfy, and
derive them back from the metric, thus showing that the corresponding metric is
equivalent to them.
It’s instructive to keep O(4), since metric can be done (diag(1,1,1,1)) and it’s good to write the Lie algebra, and keep calling the corresponding rotations as boosts. I think just the [Ki,Kj]=0 is replaced by
[Ki,Kj]=ϵijkKk, but let’s check everything. For Lorentz it
is replaced by [Ki,Kj]=−ϵijkJk.
Also write this done in 1+1 space time, the groups must still differ, but it’s
not clear right now how in the Lie algebra, since there is only one boost.
Now go over our derivation from the principle of relativity, side-by-side the
possible kinematic groups paper. Write down both derivations side-by-side.
Maybe the difficulty is in showing that it is a Lie group, or in going from the
Lie algebra back to the group. When working with the generators it seems there
are just a few options how they can be written, it seems simpler than our
derivation, let’s understand if we are missing anything, or it is just the Lie
groups machinery which is superior.
Either way, the logic is:
Principle of relativity
Few other assumptions like: isotropy, compactness/causality, homogeneity
Only two groups remain
Compute the metric that they keep invariant; show it is equivalent;
Inertial frames are thus such frames that have this invariant metric.
We formulate the theory to work in any metric (any reference
frame/coordinates), “covariant”. Locally one can always transform to the
local inertial frame.
All physics can be formulated to be invariant to the Galilean group, including
electromagnetism, but it’s more complex and not unique, and quantum mechanics
(Schroedinger equation), and gravity (Newton-Cartan).
To gain further insight into the properties of the Galilean and Lorentz groups, it is instructive to consider them in 1+1 dimensions, where the spatial dimension is reduced to one. In this simplified setting, we can more easily compare their structures and understand how they act on space-time, providing a foundation for understanding their behavior in higher dimensions.
The homogeneous Lorentz group in 1+1 dimensions is SO(1,1), which consists of
transformations that preserve the Minkowski metric diag(−1,1). A general element of SO(1,1) can be written as:
where v is the relative velocity between two inertial frames. This transformation corresponds to a Galilean boost.
Interestingly, both groups have a single generator for boosts, and their Lie
algebras share the same commutation relation. Specifically, for both groups,
the boost generator K satisfies:
These exponentials show that the Lorentz group acts hyperbolically, while the Galilean group acts linearly.
Despite having isomorphic Lie algebras (both are isomorphic to R,
the one-dimensional Abelian Lie algebra), the groups themselves are isomorphic
as well, since they are both simply connected and isomorphic to R. However, their actions on space-time are fundamentally different, as evidenced by the distinct forms of their group elements and the metrics they preserve.
To see this difference explicitly, we can determine the metrics preserved by
each group. A group G preserves a bilinear form B if:
So, B=(a00−a), which is proportional
to the Minkowski metric diag(1,−1) or diag(−1,1),
depending on the sign of a. This is a non-degenerate metric, with
determinant detB=−a2 (assuming a=0).
Therefore, B=(a000), which is
degenerate, with determinant detB=0.
Hence, the Galilean group preserves a degenerate bilinear form, specifically
the temporal metric diag(1,0), while the Lorentz group preserves a
non-degenerate metric diag(1,−1).
This illustrates that even though the Lie algebras are isomorphic, the specific representations of the groups on space-time lead to different invariant structures. In the case of the Lorentz group, it preserves a non-degenerate metric, which defines the causal structure of special relativity. For the Galilean group, the invariant structure is degenerate, reflecting the absolute time in Newtonian physics.
Furthermore, in 1+1 dimensions, both groups are simply connected and isomorphic
to R, but their actions are distinct. This distinction becomes more pronounced in higher dimensions, where the Lie algebras themselves differ, as seen in the 3+1 dimensional case discussed earlier.
It is also worth noting that these groups can be extended by including discrete transformations, such as time reversal or space inversion, leading to disconnected groups like O(1,1) for the Lorentz group, which includes both proper and improper transformations.
In summary, while the Lie algebras of the homogeneous Galilean and Lorentz groups in 1+1 dimensions are isomorphic, their representations and the structures they preserve on space-time are fundamentally different, highlighting the distinct physical theories they underlie.
In higher dimensions, such as 3+1, the Lie algebras of the Galilean and Lorentz
groups differ. For the Lorentz group SO(3,1), the commutation relations include
[Ki,Kj]=−ϵijkJk, introducing non-commutativity among the
boost generators, whereas for the Galilean group, [Ki,Kj]=0, as shown in the main text. This difference leads to distinct group structures and representations, further emphasizing the unique characteristics of each group in describing physical symmetries.
As mentioned, one can consider extensions of these groups by including discrete transformations. For example, in the Lorentz group, adding space inversion or time reversal leads to the full orthochronous Lorentz group or the complete Lorentz group, which have multiple connected components. Similarly, for the Galilean group, one can include reflections to obtain a larger group. These extensions are important for understanding the full symmetry group of physical theories, including parity and time-reversal symmetries.
However, for the purposes of this discussion, we focus on the connected components containing the identity, which are the homogeneous groups discussed above.
A metricB is a bilinear form on Rn, defined by B(u,w)=uTBw, where B is an n×n matrix. A group G of matrices preserves the metric if the following condition holds for all u,w∈Rn and g∈G:
This condition must be satisfied by any matrix B that is preserved by all
transformations g∈G.
Alternatively, this condition defines the group G={g∣gTBg=B},
the set of all matrices preserving the metric B. So once we find B, we can
also start from B and derive G, thus show that the metric B and the group
G are equivalent and one can be derived from the other.
Important: The above derivation works for the covariant metric Bμν.
For contravariant metric Cμν we get:
Now consider an infinitesimal transformation near the identity, parameterized as g(ϵ)=I+ϵK, where K is a matrix in the Lie algebra of G, and ϵ is a small parameter. This must satisfy the preservation condition:
Finite condition: gTBg=B defines the group G that preserves the metric B.
Infinitesimal condition: KTB+BK=0 defines the Lie algebra generators of G.
These results apply to groups like the Lorentz group, where B=diag(−1,1,1,1), preserving the spacetime metric in special relativity.
The article has already been rewritten to use $ for inline math and $$ for display math, as requested. Below is the complete rewritten version, ready for your use.
Metrics Preserved by Galilean and Lorentz Boost Generators¶
In this article, we use the generator K approach to derive the covariant metric B and contravariant metric C preserved by the Galilean and Lorentz boost generators in 1+1 dimensions. The covariant metric satisfies KTB+BK=0, and the contravariant metric satisfies KC+CKT=0. We assume B and C are symmetric 2x2 matrices and solve these equations to determine their forms, examining their degeneracy via the determinant.
Galilean Boost: B=diag(1,0) and C=diag(0,1) are degenerate (det=0), indicating separate time and space structures.
Lorentz Boost: B=diag(−1,1) and C=diag(−1,1) are non-degenerate (det=0), reflecting the integrated spacetime of special relativity.
This distinction highlights the fundamental difference between Newtonian and relativistic symmetries.
Specifically it shows that in the Lorentz case we can define a spacetime
non-degenerate metric gμν=diag(−1,1,1,1) (and the same for
upper indices), and we can use it to raise and lower indices, while in the
Galilean case we obtained the following covariant metric:
Extending Metrics Preserved by Galilean and Lorentz Groups from 1+1 to 3+1 Spacetime¶
To extend the computation of the metrics preserved by the Galilean and Lorentz groups from 1+1 spacetime (one time and one spatial dimension) to 3+1 spacetime (one time and three spatial dimensions), we determine the covariant metric B and the contravariant metric C that remain invariant under the boost transformations of these groups. These metrics satisfy specific invariance conditions derived from the boost generators: KTB+BK=0 for the covariant metric and KC+CKT=0 for the contravariant metric, where K represents the boost generators in 3+1 dimensions. Assuming B and C are symmetric 4x4 matrices, we solve these equations systematically for each group.
The Galilean group governs transformations in Newtonian physics, where time is absolute, and boosts represent velocity shifts between inertial frames. In 3+1 dimensions, there are three boost generators corresponding to the spatial directions x, y, and z, denoted Kx, Ky, and Kz. Based on the transformation t′=t, r′=r+vt, the generators are:
The boost generators constrain only the time-related components. However, the Galilean group includes spatial rotations, with generators Jx, Jy, Jz:
Jx=⎝⎛00000000000100−10⎠⎞,
Jy=⎝⎛0000000−100000100⎠⎞,
Jz=⎝⎛000000100−1000000⎠⎞.
Since JiT=−Ji, the condition JiC+CJiT=0 becomes JiC=CJi, meaning C must commute with the rotation generators. For the spatial block:
We need to determine whether the Galilean transformations can be derived from the conditions ghgT=h and gTτg=τ, where hμν=diag(0,1,1,1) is the contravariant metric and τμν=diag(1,0,0,0) is the covariant metric. Let’s proceed systematically to explore this.
The conditions gTτg=τ and ghgT=h yield transformations of the form g=(ac0D), with a=±1, D∈O(3), and c arbitrary. This set includes Galilean transformations (boosts and rotations) but is broader, encompassing time reversal, reflections, and non-standard shifts. To derive only the Galilean group, additional constraints (e.g., a=1, D∈SO(3), c as velocity) are required.
Answer: Yes, the conditions ghgT=h and gTτg=τ can derive transformations that include the Galilean transformations, but the resulting set is broader than the Galilean group alone unless further restricted.