Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Lie Groups III Examples Bottom Up

so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3) Lie Algebra

Step 1: Define the so(3) Lie Algebra

The Lie algebra so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3) is a three-dimensional real Lie algebra generated by basis elements Jx,Jy,JzJ_x, J_y, J_z with the defining commutation relations:

[Ji,Jj]=iϵijkJk,[J_i, J_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,

where i,j,k=x,y,zi, j, k = x, y, z, ϵijk\epsilon_{ijk} is the Levi-Civita symbol (totally antisymmetric with ϵxyz=1\epsilon_{xyz} = 1), and summation over repeated indices is implied. Explicitly, these are:

This convention, common in physics, ensures that in unitary representations, the operators are Hermitian, which is suitable for the ladder operator approach. Alternatively one can absorb the ii into the generators and obtain [Ji,Jj]=ϵijkJk[J_i, J_j] = \epsilon_{ijk} J_k.

Step 2: Introduce Ladder Operators

In the ladder operator method, we define the raising and lowering operators as:

J+=Jx+iJy,J=JxiJy.J_+ = J_x + i J_y, \quad J_- = J_x - i J_y.

These operators are complex linear combinations of the generators, facilitating the analysis of representations. To proceed, we compute their commutation relations using the so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3) algebra.

[Jz,J+]=[Jz,Jx+iJy]=[Jz,Jx]+i[Jz,Jy]=[J_z, J_+] = [J_z, J_x + i J_y] = [J_z, J_x] + i [J_z, J_y] =
=iJy+i(iJx)=iJy+Jx=Jx+iJy=J+,=i J_y + i (-i J_x) = i J_y + J_x = J_x + i J_y = J_+\,,
[Jz,J]=[Jz,JxiJy]=[Jz,Jx]i[Jz,Jy]=[J_z, J_-] = [J_z, J_x - i J_y] = [J_z, J_x] - i [J_z, J_y] =
=iJyi(iJx)=iJyJx=(JxiJy)=J,= i J_y - i (-i J_x) = i J_y - J_x = -(J_x - i J_y) = -J_-\,,
[J+,J]=[Jx+iJy,JxiJy]=[Jx,Jx]i[Jx,Jy]+i[Jy,Jx]i2[Jy,Jy]=[J_+, J_-] = [J_x + i J_y, J_x - i J_y] = [J_x, J_x] - i [J_x, J_y] + i [J_y, J_x] - i^2 [J_y, J_y]=
=0i(iJz)+i(iJz)+(1)0=i2Jz+i2Jz=Jz(Jz)=2Jz.= 0 - i (i J_z) + i (-i J_z) + (-1) \cdot 0 = -i^2 J_z + i^2 J_z = J_z - (-J_z) = 2 J_z.

Thus, the ladder operator algebra is:

[Jz,J+]=J+,[Jz,J]=J,[J+,J]=2Jz.\begin{align} [J_z, J_+] &= J_+ \,,\\ [J_z, J_-] &= -J_- \,,\\ [J_+, J_-] &= 2 J_z\,. \end{align}

Step 3: Representations of the Lie Algebra

A representation of so(3)\mathfrak{so}(3) is a homomorphism from the Lie algebra to the linear operators on a complex vector space VV, preserving the commutation relations. Since SO(3) is compact, its finite-dimensional representations are completely reducible, so we focus on irreducible representations.

Assume VV is a finite-dimensional complex vector space where JzJ_z is diagonalizable (possible in complex representations). Let m|m\rangle be an eigenvector of JzJ_z with eigenvalue mm:

Jzm=mm.J_z |m\rangle = m |m\rangle.
Jz(J+m)=(J+Jz+[Jz,J+])m=J+Jzm+J+m=J+(mm)+J+m=m(J+m)+J+m=(m+1)(J+m).J_z (J_+ |m\rangle) = (J_+ J_z + [J_z, J_+]) |m\rangle = J_+ J_z |m\rangle + J_+ |m\rangle = J_+ (m |m\rangle) + J_+ |m\rangle = m (J_+ |m\rangle) + J_+ |m\rangle = (m + 1) (J_+ |m\rangle).

Thus, J+mJ_+ |m\rangle is either zero or an eigenvector of JzJ_z with eigenvalue m+1m + 1.

Jz(Jm)=(JJz+[Jz,J])m=JJzmJm=J(mm)Jm=m(Jm)Jm=(m1)(Jm).J_z (J_- |m\rangle) = (J_- J_z + [J_z, J_-]) |m\rangle = J_- J_z |m\rangle - J_- |m\rangle = J_- (m |m\rangle) - J_- |m\rangle = m (J_- |m\rangle) - J_- |m\rangle = (m - 1) (J_- |m\rangle).

Thus, JmJ_- |m\rangle is either zero or an eigenvector with eigenvalue m1m - 1.

Since VV is finite-dimensional, the eigenvalues cannot increase or decrease indefinitely. There must exist a highest eigenvalue jj such that:

J+j=0,Jzj=jj,J_+ |j\rangle = 0, \quad J_z |j\rangle = j |j\rangle,

and a lowest eigenvalue mminm_{\text{min}} such that Jmmin=0J_- |m_{\text{min}}\rangle = 0.

Step 4: Construct the Representation

Starting from the highest weight vector j|j\rangle, apply JJ_- repeatedly:

Define mJjmj|m\rangle \propto J_-^{j - m} |j\rangle (with appropriate normalization), where m=j,j1,m = j, j-1, \ldots, until Jmmin=0J_- |m_{\text{min}}\rangle = 0. Suppose mmin=jm_{\text{min}} = -j, so:

Jj=0,Jzj=jj.J_- |-j\rangle = 0, \quad J_z |-j\rangle = -j |-j\rangle.

The eigenvalues range from jj to j-j in steps of 1: j,j1,,j+1,jj, j-1, \ldots, -j+1, -j. The number of states is:

(j)(j)+1=j+j+1=2j+1,(j) - (-j) + 1 = j + j + 1 = 2j + 1,

implying 2j2j is an integer, so jj is a non-negative integer or half-integer (j=0,12,1,32,j = 0, \frac{1}{2}, 1, \frac{3}{2}, \ldots).

Step 5: Use the Casimir Operator

Define the Casimir operator:

J2=Jx2+Jy2+Jz2.J^2 = J_x^2 + J_y^2 + J_z^2.

Express it using ladder operators:

Jx=J++J2,Jy=J+J2i.J_x = \frac{J_+ + J_-}{2}, \quad J_y = \frac{J_+ - J_-}{2i}.

Compute:

Jx2=(J++J2)2=14(J+2+J+J+JJ++J2),J_x^2 = \left( \frac{J_+ + J_-}{2} \right)^2 = \frac{1}{4} (J_+^2 + J_+ J_- + J_- J_+ + J_-^2),
Jy2=(J+J2i)2=14(J+2J+JJJ++J2),J_y^2 = \left( \frac{J_+ - J_-}{2i} \right)^2 = \frac{1}{-4} (J_+^2 - J_+ J_- - J_- J_+ + J_-^2),
Jx2+Jy2=14(J+2+J+J+JJ++J2)14(J+2J+JJJ++J2)=12(J+J+JJ+).J_x^2 + J_y^2 = \frac{1}{4} (J_+^2 + J_+ J_- + J_- J_+ + J_-^2) - \frac{1}{4} (J_+^2 - J_+ J_- - J_- J_+ + J_-^2) = \frac{1}{2} (J_+ J_- + J_- J_+).

Thus:

J2=Jz2+12(J+J+JJ+).J^2 = J_z^2 + \frac{1}{2} (J_+ J_- + J_- J_+).

Since [J+,J]=2Jz[J_+, J_-] = 2 J_z, we have J+J=JJ++2JzJ_+ J_- = J_- J_+ + 2 J_z, so:

J2=Jz2+12(J+J+JJ+2Jz+2Jz)=Jz2+JJ++Jz.J^2 = J_z^2 + \frac{1}{2} (J_+ J_- + J_- J_+ - 2 J_z + 2 J_z) = J_z^2 + J_- J_+ + J_z.

For the highest weight vector:

J2j=(Jz2+JJ++Jz)j=(j2+J(0)+j)j=(j2+j)j=j(j+1)j.J^2 |j\rangle = (J_z^2 + J_- J_+ + J_z) |j\rangle = (j^2 + J_- (0) + j) |j\rangle = (j^2 + j) |j\rangle = j (j + 1) |j\rangle.

Since J2J^2 commutes with Jz,J+,JJ_z, J_+, J_-, it is a scalar in an irreducible representation: J2=j(j+1)IJ^2 = j (j + 1) I. This confirms the eigenvalues m=j,j+1,,jm = -j, -j+1, \ldots, j.

Step 6: Determine Coefficients

In a unitary representation, Jx,Jy,JzJ_x, J_y, J_z are Hermitian, so J+=JJ_+^\dagger = J_-. Assume orthonormal basis mm=δmm\langle m | m' \rangle = \delta_{mm'}:

J+m=cmm+1,Jm=dmm1.J_+ |m\rangle = c_m |m+1\rangle, \quad J_- |m\rangle = d_m |m-1\rangle.

Since mJm+1=m+1J+m\langle m | J_- | m+1 \rangle = \langle m+1 | J_+ | m \rangle^*, compute:

J+m2=mJJ+m=m(J+J2Jz)m=cm1dm2m,||J_+ |m\rangle||^2 = \langle m | J_- J_+ | m \rangle = \langle m | (J_+ J_- - 2 J_z) | m \rangle = c_{m-1} d_m - 2 m,
J+m2=cm2.||J_+ |m\rangle||^2 = |c_m|^2.

Thus, cm2=cm1dm2m|c_m|^2 = c_{m-1} d_m - 2 m. For m=jm = j, J+j=0J_+ |j\rangle = 0, so cj=0c_j = 0. For m=jm = -j, Jj=0J_- |-j\rangle = 0, so dj=0d_{-j} = 0. Solving recursively (standard in quantum mechanics) gives:

J+m=j(j+1)m(m+1)m+1,Jm=j(j+1)m(m1)m1.J_+ |m\rangle = \sqrt{j (j + 1) - m (m + 1)} |m+1\rangle, \quad J_- |m\rangle = \sqrt{j (j + 1) - m (m - 1)} |m-1\rangle.

Step 7: Relate to SO(3) Group

The Lie algebra so(3) is isomorphic to su(2), and its representations are labeled by j=0,12,1,j = 0, \frac{1}{2}, 1, \ldots, with dimension 2j+12j + 1. Exponentiating to the group, SU(2) (simply connected) admits all jj, but SO(3) = SU(2)/Z2\mathbb{Z}_2 requires single-valued representations. For integer jj, the representation is single-valued on SO(3); for half-integer jj, it is double-valued, corresponding to SU(2). Thus, SO(3) representations have j=0,1,2,j = 0, 1, 2, \ldots.

Final Answer

The irreducible representations of the SO(3) group, derived from the so(3) Lie algebra via the ladder operator approach, are labeled by integers j=0,1,2,j = 0, 1, 2, \ldots, with dimension 2j+12j + 1, where JzJ_z has eigenvalues m=j,,jm = -j, \ldots, j, and J2=j(j+1)IJ^2 = j (j + 1) I.

Angular Momentum Operators and Their Transformation for j=1j = 1

In quantum mechanics, for a system with angular momentum quantum number j=1j = 1, the angular momentum operators are represented in the basis 1,1|1, 1\rangle, 1,0|1, 0\rangle, and 1,1|1, -1\rangle. We start with the ladder operators and JzJ_z, compute JxJ_x and JyJ_y, and then apply a unitary transformation to obtain transformed operators.

1. Ladder Operators and JzJ_z

The ladder operators J+J_+ (raising) and JJ_- (lowering), along with the zz-component JzJ_z, are defined as follows:

2. Computation of JxJ_x and JyJ_y

Using the ladder operators, we compute JxJ_x and JyJ_y as follows:

These matrices, along with JzJ_z, satisfy the angular momentum commutation relations, such as [Jx,Jy]=iJz[J_x, J_y] = i J_z.

3. Unitary Transformation Matrix UU

To transform the operators into a basis where certain properties (e.g., real rotation matrices) are emphasized, we use the unitary matrix UU:

U=(12i2000112i20)U = \begin{pmatrix} -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} & \frac{i}{\sqrt{2}} & 0 \end{pmatrix}

This matrix is unitary, satisfying UU=IU^\dagger U = I, where UU^\dagger is the conjugate transpose of UU.

4. Transformed Angular Momentum Operators

The transformed operators are computed using the similarity transformation Ji=UJiUJ_i' = U^\dagger J_i U for i=x,y,zi = x, y, z:

5. Verification with iJii J_i'

To explore the properties of the transformed operators, consider iJii J_i':

Each iJii J_i' is real and skew-symmetric (i.e., (iJi)T=iJi(i J_i')^T = -i J_i'), which is consistent with generators of real rotation matrices in SO(3).

Computing the rotation matrices

In this section we use:

We have:

Jx2=(000010001),J_x^2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}\,,
Jy2=(100000001),J_y^2 = \begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}\,,
Jz2=(100010000),J_z^2 = \begin{pmatrix} -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}\,,

and:

Jx2+Jy2+Jz2=(200020002).J_x^2 + J_y^2 + J_z^2 = \begin{pmatrix} -2 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -2 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -2 \end{pmatrix}\,.

We have Jx3=JxJx2=JxJ_x^3=J_x J_x^2 = -J_x and Jx4=Jx2Jx2=Jx2J_x^4=J_x^2 J_x^2 = -J_x^2 and Jx5=Jx3=JxJ_x^5=-J_x^3=J_x.

Now we compute:

Rx(θ)=eθJx=I+θJx+(θJx)22!+(θJx)33!+=\mathbf{R}_x(\theta) = e^{\theta\mathbf{J}_x} =\mathbf{I} + \theta\mathbf{J}_x + {(\theta\mathbf{J}_x)^2 \over 2!} + {(\theta\mathbf{J}_x)^3 \over 3!} + \cdots =
=I+θJx+θ2Jx22!θ3Jx3!θ4Jx24!+θ5Jx5!+==\mathbf{I} + \theta\mathbf{J}_x + {\theta^2\mathbf{J}_x^2 \over 2!} - {\theta^3\mathbf{J}_x \over 3!} - {\theta^4\mathbf{J}_x^2 \over 4!} + {\theta^5\mathbf{J}_x \over 5!} + \cdots =
=I+Jx(θθ33!+θ55!)+Jx2(θ22!θ44!+)==\mathbf{I} + \mathbf{J}_x \left(\theta - {\theta^3 \over 3!} + {\theta^5 \over 5!} - \cdots \right) + \mathbf{J}_x^2\left( {\theta^2 \over 2!} - {\theta^4 \over 4!} + \cdots \right) =
=I+Jx2+Jx(θθ33!+θ55!)Jx2(1θ22!+θ44!)==\mathbf{I} + \mathbf{J}_x^2 + \mathbf{J}_x \left(\theta - {\theta^3 \over 3!} + {\theta^5 \over 5!} - \cdots \right) - \mathbf{J}_x^2\left(1 - {\theta^2 \over 2!} + {\theta^4 \over 4!} - \cdots \right) =
=I+Jx2+JxsinθJx2cosθ=(1000cosθsinθ0sinθcosθ).=\mathbf{I} + \mathbf{J}_x^2 + \mathbf{J}_x \sin\theta - \mathbf{J}_x^2 \cos\theta = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \cos\theta & \sin\theta \\ 0 & -\sin\theta & \cos\theta \end{pmatrix}\,.

That is the rotation matrix around the xx-axis.

The Homogeneous Lorentz Group from the Ground Up

The so(1,3)so(1,3) Lie Algebra

Step 1: Define the so(1,3)so(1,3) Lie Algebra

The Lie algebra so(1,3)so(1,3) is the Lie algebra of the Lorentz group, which preserves the Minkowski metric in four-dimensional spacetime with signature (1,1,1,1)(1, -1, -1, -1). It is a six-dimensional real Lie algebra generated by three rotation generators Jx,Jy,JzJ_x, J_y, J_z (or JiJ_i for i=1,2,3i = 1, 2, 3) and three boost generators Kx,Ky,KzK_x, K_y, K_z (or KiK_i), corresponding to rotations in spatial planes and boosts mixing time and space coordinates, respectively.

In the physics convention, where generators are Hermitian in unitary representations, the commutation relations are:

[Ji,Jj]=iϵijkJk,[J_i, J_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,
[Ji,Kj]=iϵijkKk,[J_i, K_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k,
[Ki,Kj]=iϵijkJk,[K_i, K_j] = -i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,

where i,j,k=1,2,3i, j, k = 1, 2, 3 (with J1=JxJ_1 = J_x, etc.), ϵijk\epsilon_{ijk} is the Levi-Civita symbol (ϵ123=1\epsilon_{123} = 1), and summation over repeated indices is implied. Explicitly:

These relations reflect that JiJ_i generate an so(3)so(3) subalgebra (rotations), while KiK_i introduce the non-compact nature of so(1,3)so(1,3) due to the negative sign in the boost commutator.

Step 2: Separate the Algebra Using a Complex Trick

To simplify the structure, define new generators:

Ai=Ji+iKi2,Bi=JiiKi2,A_i = \frac{J_i + i K_i}{2}, \quad B_i = \frac{J_i - i K_i}{2},

for i=1,2,3i = 1, 2, 3. These are complex linear combinations of the real generators JiJ_i and KiK_i. Compute their commutation relations to reveal the algebra’s structure.

Commutator [Ai,Aj][A_i, A_j]:
Ai=Ji+iKi2,Aj=Jj+iKj2,A_i = \frac{J_i + i K_i}{2}, \quad A_j = \frac{J_j + i K_j}{2},
[Ai,Aj]=[Ji+iKi2,Jj+iKj2]=14[Ji+iKi,Jj+iKj].[A_i, A_j] = \left[ \frac{J_i + i K_i}{2}, \frac{J_j + i K_j}{2} \right] = \frac{1}{4} [J_i + i K_i, J_j + i K_j].

Expand:

[Ji+iKi,Jj+iKj]=[Ji,Jj]+i[Ji,Kj]+i[Ki,Jj]+i2[Ki,Kj],[J_i + i K_i, J_j + i K_j] = [J_i, J_j] + i [J_i, K_j] + i [K_i, J_j] + i^2 [K_i, K_j],

Substitute:

=iϵijkJk+i(iϵijkKk)+i(iϵijkKk)+(1)(iϵijkJk),= i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k + i (i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k) + i (i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k) + (-1) (-i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k),
=iϵijkJkϵijkKkϵijkKk+iϵijkJk,= i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k - \epsilon_{ijk} K_k - \epsilon_{ijk} K_k + i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k,
=2iϵijkJk2ϵijkKk,= 2 i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k -2\epsilon_{ijk} K_k,
=4iϵijk(Jk+iKk)/2,= 4 i \epsilon_{ijk} (J_k +i K_k)/2,
=4iϵijkAk,= 4 i \epsilon_{ijk} A_k,

so:

[Ai,Aj]=14(4iϵijkAk)=iϵijkAk.[A_i, A_j] = \frac{1}{4} (4 i \epsilon_{ijk} A_k) = i \epsilon_{ijk} A_k\,.
Commutator [Bi,Bj][B_i, B_j]:
Bi=JiiKi2,Bj=JjiKj2,B_i = \frac{J_i - i K_i}{2}, \quad B_j = \frac{J_j - i K_j}{2},
[Bi,Bj]=14[JiiKi,JjiKj],[B_i, B_j] = \frac{1}{4} [J_i - i K_i, J_j - i K_j],
=14([Ji,Jj]i[Ji,Kj]i[Ki,Jj]+i2[Ki,Kj]),= \frac{1}{4} ([J_i, J_j] - i [J_i, K_j] - i [K_i, J_j] + i^2 [K_i, K_j]),
=14(iϵijkJki(iϵijkKk)i(iϵijkKk)+(1)(iϵijkJk)),= \frac{1}{4} (i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k - i (i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k) - i (i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k) + (-1) (-i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k)),
=14(iϵijkJk+ϵijkKk+ϵijkKk+iϵijkJk),= \frac{1}{4} (i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k + \epsilon_{ijk} K_k + \epsilon_{ijk} K_k + i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k),
=14(2iϵijkJk+2ϵijkKk)=iϵijkJkiKk2=iϵijkBk.= \frac{1}{4} (2 i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k + 2\epsilon_{ijk} K_k) = i \epsilon_{ijk} \frac{J_k - i K_k}{2} = i \epsilon_{ijk} B_k.
Commutator [Ai,Bj][A_i, B_j]:
[Ai,Bj]=[Ji+iKi2,JjiKj2]=14[Ji+iKi,JjiKj],[A_i, B_j] = \left[ \frac{J_i + i K_i}{2}, \frac{J_j - i K_j}{2} \right] = \frac{1}{4} [J_i + i K_i, J_j - i K_j],
=14([Ji,Jj]i[Ji,Kj]+i[Ki,Jj]i2[Ki,Kj]),= \frac{1}{4} ([J_i, J_j] - i [J_i, K_j] + i [K_i, J_j] - i^2 [K_i, K_j]),
=14(iϵijkJki(iϵijkKk)+i(iϵijkKk)(1)(iϵijkJk)),= \frac{1}{4} (i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k - i (i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k) + i (i \epsilon_{ijk} K_k) - (-1) (-i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k)),
=14(iϵijkJk+ϵijkKkϵijkKkiϵijkJk)=0.= \frac{1}{4} (i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k + \epsilon_{ijk} K_k - \epsilon_{ijk} K_k - i \epsilon_{ijk} J_k) = 0.

Thus:

[Ai,Aj]=iϵijkAk,[Bi,Bj]=iϵijkBk,[Ai,Bj]=0.[A_i, A_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} A_k, \quad [B_i, B_j] = i \epsilon_{ijk} B_k, \quad [A_i, B_j] = 0.

Each set {Ai}\{A_i\} and {Bi}\{B_i\} satisfies the su(2)su(2) commutation relations, and they commute with each other, suggesting so(1,3)so(1,3) is related to su(2)su(2)su(2) \oplus su(2) via complexification.

Step 3: Interpret the Algebra Structure

Invert the definitions:

Ji=Ai+Bi,Ki=i(AiBi).J_i = A_i + B_i, \quad K_i = -i (A_i - B_i).

The so(1,3)so(1,3) algebra, with real generators Ji,KiJ_i, K_i, maps to two commuting su(2)su(2) algebras via complex generators Ai,BiA_i, B_i. The complexification of so(1,3)so(1,3), denoted so(1,3)Cso(1,3)_ℂ, is isomorphic to sl(2,C)sl(2,ℂ), and as a real Lie algebra, so(1,3)so(1,3) has dimension 6, matching sl(2,C)sl(2,ℂ) over the reals. This trick reveals that representations can be constructed from su(2)su(2) representations.

Representations of so(1,3)so(1,3)

Step 4: Label Representations Using su(2)su(2)

Since AiA_i and BiB_i generate two independent su(2)su(2) algebras, representations of so(1,3)so(1,3) are labeled by pairs (j1,j2)(j_1, j_2), where j1j_1 is the spin of the su(2)su(2) algebra generated by AiA_i, and j2j_2 is the spin of the BiB_i algebra. From su(2)su(2), j1,j2=0,12,1,32,j_1, j_2 = 0, \frac{1}{2}, 1, \frac{3}{2}, \ldots, and the representation space is the tensor product of a (2j1+1)(2j_1 + 1)-dimensional space and a (2j2+1)(2j_2 + 1)-dimensional space, with dimension:

(2j1+1)(2j2+1).(2j_1 + 1)(2j_2 + 1).

In this representation:

where Ji(j)J_i^{(j)} are the su(2)su(2) generators in the spin-jj representation.

Step 5: Identify the Vector Representation

The homogeneous Lorentz group SO(1,3)SO(1,3) acts on 4D Minkowski space via the four-vector representation, which is four-dimensional. Find (j1,j2)(j_1, j_2) such that:

(2j1+1)(2j2+1)=4.(2j_1 + 1)(2j_2 + 1) = 4.

The (1/2,1/2)(1/2, 1/2) representation is the standard four-vector representation of so(1,3)so(1,3), corresponding to fields transforming as four-vectors (e.g., the electromagnetic potential).

The Homogeneous Lorentz Group SO(1,3)SO(1,3)

Step 6: Relate to the Group

The Lie algebra so(1,3)so(1,3) corresponds to the Lorentz group SO(1,3)SO(1,3), which is non-compact, and its double cover is SL(2,C)SL(2,ℂ). Finite-dimensional representations are not unitary, but the (j1,j2)(j_1, j_2) labeling applies, with SO(1,3)SO(1,3) transformations obtained by exponentiating the generators.

Transformation Matrices in the (1/2,1/2)(1/2, 1/2) Representation

Step 7: Construct Generators in (1/2,1/2)(1/2, 1/2)

For j1=1/2j_1 = 1/2, j2=1/2j_2 = 1/2, the basis is m1,m2|m_1, m_2\rangle with m1,m2=±1/2m_1, m_2 = \pm 1/2, so:

Using Jz(1/2)=σz/2J_z^{(1/2)} = \sigma_z / 2, etc., where σi\sigma_i are Pauli matrices:

Compute other generators similarly (basis ordered as above).

Step 8: Adjust to Standard Basis

In the standard vector representation, JiJ_i and KiK_i act on (t,x,y,z)(t, x, y, z):

Step 9: Exponentiate Generators

In standard basis, eθJz=(10000cosθsinθ00sinθcosθ00001)e^{\theta J_z} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & \cos\theta & -\sin\theta & 0 \\ 0 & \sin\theta & \cos\theta & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}.

eζKz=(coshζ00sinhζ01000010sinhζ00coshζ)e^{\zeta K_z} = \begin{pmatrix} \cosh\zeta & 0 & 0 & \sinh\zeta \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ \sinh\zeta & 0 & 0 & \cosh\zeta \end{pmatrix}.

These are the standard Lorentz transformation matrices, derived via exponentiation in the adjusted basis.

Transformation of Lorentz Group Generators

In this section, we derive the standard real generators of the Lorentz group in the four-vector representation, starting from the (1/2,1/2)(1/2, 1/2) representation. This process involves a change of basis using a unitary matrix UU followed by a rescaling by i-i to obtain real-valued generators.

Original Generators in the (1/2,1/2)(1/2, 1/2) Representation

The (1/2,1/2)(1/2, 1/2) representation arises from the tensor product of two spin-1/21/2 representations, typically constructed using Pauli matrices. The original generators consist of rotation generators JiJ_i and boost generators KiK_i, defined as follows:

Jx=(012120120012120012012120),Jy=(0i2i20i200i2i200i20i2i20),Jz=(1000000000000001),Kx=(0i2i20i200i2i200i20i2i20),Ky=(012120120012120012012120),Kz=(00000i0000i00000).\begin{align*} J_x &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & \frac{1}{2} & \frac{1}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ J_y &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & -\frac{i}{2} & -\frac{i}{2} & 0 \\ \frac{i}{2} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{i}{2} \\ \frac{i}{2} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{i}{2} \\ 0 & \frac{i}{2} & \frac{i}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ J_z &= \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \end{pmatrix}, \\ K_x &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{i}{2} & -\frac{i}{2} & 0 \\ \frac{i}{2} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{i}{2} \\ -\frac{i}{2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{i}{2} \\ 0 & -\frac{i}{2} & \frac{i}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ K_y &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \\ -\frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{1}{2} \\ \frac{1}{2} & 0 & 0 & \frac{1}{2} \\ 0 & \frac{1}{2} & -\frac{1}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ K_z &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -i & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & i & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}. \end{align*}

These matrices are Hermitian, ensuring a unitary representation suitable for quantum mechanics, and they satisfy the Lorentz algebra with commutation relations involving factors of ii.

Change of Basis Matrix UU

To transform these generators into the standard four-vector representation, we define a change of basis using a unitary matrix UU. This matrix is constructed from basis vectors corresponding to the four-vector components (t,x,y,z)(t, x, y, z):

t=i(012120),x=i(120012),y=(120012),z=i(012120).\begin{align*} |t\rangle &= i \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\ -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ |x\rangle &= i \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ -\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{pmatrix}, \\ |y\rangle &= \begin{pmatrix} \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 0 \\ 0 \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \end{pmatrix}, \\ |z\rangle &= -i \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix}. \end{align*}

The matrix UU is formed by arranging these vectors as columns:

U=(0i22220i2200i22i2200i220i22220).U = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & \frac{i \sqrt{2}}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} & 0 \\ \frac{i \sqrt{2}}{2} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{i \sqrt{2}}{2} \\ -\frac{i \sqrt{2}}{2} & 0 & 0 & -\frac{i \sqrt{2}}{2} \\ 0 & -\frac{i \sqrt{2}}{2} & \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} & 0 \end{pmatrix}.

This matrix is unitary, satisfying UU=IU^\dagger U = I, where UU^\dagger is the conjugate transpose of UU, ensuring that the transformation preserves the algebraic structure.

Transformation and Rescaling by i-i

We apply a similarity transformation to the original generators using UU:

Ji=UJiU,Ki=UKiU.J_i' = U^\dagger J_i U, \quad K_i' = U^\dagger K_i U.

The resulting matrices JiJ_i' and KiK_i' are purely imaginary due to the properties of the original generators and UU. To match the standard real four-vector representation used in classical relativity, we rescale by multiplying by i-i:

Jireal=iJi,Kireal=iKi.J_i^{\text{real}} = -i J_i', \quad K_i^{\text{real}} = -i K_i'.

This step converts the Hermitian, unitary representation into a real, antisymmetric one, aligning with the conventions of the Lorentz group in four-vector form.

Final Real Generators

After applying the transformation and rescaling, the final real generators are:

Jxreal=(0000000000010010),Jyreal=(0000000100000100),Jzreal=(0000001001000000),Kxreal=(0100100000000000),Kyreal=(0010000010000000),Kzreal=(0001000000001000).\begin{align*} J_x^{\text{real}} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & -1 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ J_y^{\text{real}} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ J_z^{\text{real}} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ K_x^{\text{real}} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ K_y^{\text{real}} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \\ K_z^{\text{real}} &= \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}. \end{align*}

These generators are real and antisymmetric, matching the standard form of the Lorentz group generators in the four-vector representation, where JirealJ_i^{\text{real}} generate rotations and KirealK_i^{\text{real}} generate boosts.

Final Summary

The so(1,3)so(1,3) algebra, via the AA and BB trick, is represented as (j1,j2)(j_1, j_2), with the four-vector representation being (1/2,1/2)(1/2, 1/2). The transformation matrices for SO(1,3)SO(1,3) in this representation are the standard Lorentz transformations, obtained by exponentiating JiJ_i and KiK_i after basis adjustment.

Translation-Rotation Group SE(3)

We start from the commutation relations of the generators:

[Ji,Jj]=ϵijkJk,[J_i, J_j] = \epsilon_{ijk} J_k\,,

[Ji,Pj]=ϵijkPk,[J_i, P_j] = \epsilon_{ijk} P_k\,,

[Pi,Pj]=0.[P_i, P_j] = 0\,.

Postulating Matrices

Assumption: we postulate a particular representation using 4x4 matrices as follows:

J1=(0000001001000000),J_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & -1 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,,
J2=(0010000010000000),J_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & -1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,,
J3=(0100100000000000),J_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 & 0 \\ -1 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,,
P1=(0001000000000000),P_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,,
P2=(0000000100000000),P_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,,
P3=(0000000000010000).P_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,.

These satisfy the commutation relations, but we have not computed them, nor shown what other representations there are. So this treatment is not complete yet. But assuming the above, the rest is then rigorous.

A general rotation is then:

R(n)=enJ=(R001).R({\bf n}) = e^{{\bf n}\cdot{\bf J}} =\begin{pmatrix} {\bf R} & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,.

A general translation is then:

T(t)=etP=(1t01).T({\bf t}) = e^{{\bf t}\cdot{\bf P}} =\begin{pmatrix} 1 & {\bf t} \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,.

A general group element is:

g=(t,n)=T(t)R(n)=etPenJ=g = ({\bf t}, {\bf n}) = T({\bf t}) R({\bf n}) = e^{{\bf t}\cdot{\bf P}} e^{{\bf n}\cdot{\bf J}} =
=(1t01)(R001)=(Rt01).=\begin{pmatrix} 1 & {\bf t} \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} {\bf R} & 0 \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} {\bf R} & {\bf t} \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,.

A composition of elements is:

g1=[R1t101],g2=[R2t201],g_1 = \begin{bmatrix} R_1 & t_1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}, \quad g_2 = \begin{bmatrix} R_2 & t_2 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix},
g1g2=[R1t101][R2t201]=[R1R2R1t2+t101].g_1 g_2 = \begin{bmatrix} R_1 & t_1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} \begin{bmatrix} R_2 & t_2 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix} = \begin{bmatrix} R_1 R_2 & R_1 t_2 + t_1 \\ 0 & 1 \end{bmatrix}.

And thus we derived the group law:

(t1,R1)(t2,R2)=(t1+R1t2,R1R2).(t_1, R_1) \cdot (t_2, R_2) = (t_1 + R_1 t_2, R_1 R_2)\,.

The action of (t,R)(t, R) on a point xx in R3\mathbb{R}^3 is:

(Rt01)(x1)=(Rx+t1).\begin{pmatrix} {\bf R} & {\bf t} \\ 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} {\bf x} \\ 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} {\bf R x + t} \\ 1 \\ \end{pmatrix}\,.

So xRx+tx \rightarrow Rx + t.

Another way to derive this is from the group law:

(t1,R1)(x,0)=(t1+R1x,0).(t_1, R_1) \cdot (x, 0) = (t_1 + R_1 x, 0)\,.

Comparing to (t3,R3)(t_3, R_3) we get t3=R1x+t1t_3 = R_1 x + t_1.

Direct Derivation

Let’s derive the group composition law for the rotation-translation group, SE(3). This is the group of rigid body motions.

Setup and Goal

A general element g of the group SE(3) can be written as a product of a translation and a rotation. Using the operator formalism:

g=exp(aP)exp(nJ)=T(a)R(n).g = \exp(\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{P}) \exp(\mathbf{n} \cdot \mathbf{J}) = T(\mathbf{a}) R(\mathbf{n})\,.

where:

We want to find the composition law for g=ggg'' = g' g. Let g=T(a)Rg = T(\mathbf{a})R and g=T(a)Rg' = T(\mathbf{a'})R'. The product is:

g=gg=(T(a)R)(T(a)R)=T(a)RT(a)R.g'' = g' g = \left( T(\mathbf{a'}) R' \right) \left( T(\mathbf{a}) R \right) = T(\mathbf{a'}) R' T(\mathbf{a}) R\,.

Our goal is to express gg'' in the same form, g=T(a)Rg'' = T(\mathbf{a''}) R'', and find the expressions for a\mathbf{a''} and RR''.

Deriving the Composition Law

Now we compute:

g=gg=T(a)RT(a)R=g'' = g' g = T(\mathbf{a'}) R' T(\mathbf{a}) R =
=T(a)RT(a)(R)1RR== T(\mathbf{a'}) R' T(\mathbf{a}) (R')^{-1} R' R =
=T(a)ReaP(R)1RR== T(\mathbf{a'}) R' e^{{\bf a} \cdot {\bf P}} (R')^{-1} R' R =
=T(a)eRaP(R)1RR== T(\mathbf{a'}) e^ {R' {\bf a} \cdot {\bf P} (R')^{-1} } R' R =
=T(a)e(Ra)PRR== T(\mathbf{a'}) e^ {(R' {\bf a}) \cdot {\bf P} } R' R =
=T(a)T(Ra)RR== T(\mathbf{a'}) T(R' {\bf a}) R' R =
=T(a+Ra)RR.= T(\mathbf{a'} + R' {\bf a}) R' R \,.

We derived the same group law as before.

Note 1

Above we derived a specific case that describes how the translation generators PiP_i are transformed by the rotation RR':

exp(tJ3)P1exp(tJ3)=P1cos(t)+P2sin(t)\exp(t J_3) P_1 \exp(-t J_3) = P_1 \cos(t) + P_2 \sin(t)

I think that the following can also be derived:

exp(tJ3)P2exp(tJ3)=P1sin(t)+P2cos(t)\exp(t J_3) P_2 \exp(-t J_3) = -P_1 \sin(t) + P_2 \cos(t)
exp(tJ3)P3exp(tJ3)=P3\exp(t J_3) P_3 \exp(-t J_3) = P_3

These three relations can thus be written as:

R(P1P2P3)R1=(P1cost+P2sintP2sint+P2costP3).R \begin{pmatrix} P_1 \\ P_2 \\ P_3 \\ \end{pmatrix} R^{-1} =\begin{pmatrix} P_1 \cos t + P_2 \sin t \\ -P_2 \sin t + P_2 \cos t \\ P_3 \\ \end{pmatrix} \,.

The RHS can be written as:

(P1cost+P2sintP2sint+P2costP3)=(costsint0sintcost0001)(P1P2P3)=R(P1P2P3).\begin{pmatrix} P_1 \cos t + P_2 \sin t \\ -P_2 \sin t + P_2 \cos t \\ P_3 \\ \end{pmatrix} =\begin{pmatrix} \cos t & \sin t & 0 \\ -\sin t & \cos t & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ \end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} P_1 \\ P_2 \\ P_3 \\ \end{pmatrix} =R \begin{pmatrix} P_1 \\ P_2 \\ P_3 \\ \end{pmatrix} \,.

So we get:

RP(R)1=RPR {\bf P} (R)^{-1} = R {\bf P}

Where in this case RR is a rotation around the zz axis.

This is an example of the adjoint action of the rotation group on the translation generators. The commutation relation between rotation and translation generators is [Ji,Pj]=ϵijkPk[J_i, P_j] = \epsilon_{ijk} P_k. This rule implies that the generators of translation (P1,P2,P3)(P_1, P_2, P_3) transform as a vector under conjugation by a rotation operator.

Therefore, the conjugation of a generator PjP_j by a rotation RR' results in a linear combination of the generators, where the coefficients are the elements of the rotation matrix corresponding to RR':

RPj(R)1=i=13RijPiR' P_j (R')^{-1} = \sum_{i=1}^3 R'_{ij} P_i

where RijR'_{ij} is the element in the i-th row and j-th column of the matrix representation of RR'.

Applying this to our expression for the exponent:

R(aP)(R)1=j=13aj(i=13RijPi)=i=13(j=13Rijaj)PiR' (\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{P}) (R')^{-1} = \sum_{j=1}^3 a_j \left( \sum_{i=1}^3 R'_{ij} P_i \right) = \sum_{i=1}^3 \left( \sum_{j=1}^3 R'_{ij} a_j \right) P_i

The term in the parenthesis is the i-th component of the vector that results from applying the rotation RR' to the vector a\mathbf{a}. Let’s denote this rotated vector as RaR'\mathbf{a}. So we have:

R(aP)(R)1=(Ra)PR' (\mathbf{a} \cdot \mathbf{P}) (R')^{-1} = (R'\mathbf{a}) \cdot \mathbf{P}

Substituting this back into the expression for the conjugated translation operator:

RT(a)(R)1=exp((Ra)P)=T(Ra)R' T(\mathbf{a}) (R')^{-1} = \exp((R'\mathbf{a}) \cdot \mathbf{P}) = T(R'\mathbf{a})

Note 2

Since the translation generators commute with each other ([Pi,Pj]=0[P_i, P_j] = 0), the product of two translation operators is a single translation operator whose vector is the sum of the individual vectors:

T(x)T(y)=exp(xP)exp(yP)=exp((x+y)P)=T(x+y)T(\mathbf{x}) T(\mathbf{y}) = \exp(\mathbf{x} \cdot \mathbf{P}) \exp(\mathbf{y} \cdot \mathbf{P}) = \exp((\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{y}) \cdot \mathbf{P}) = T(\mathbf{x}+\mathbf{y})