Lie Groups IV: Three Rotations
The goal is to prove the following identity for Pauli matrices:
e − i θ 1 2 σ 1 e − i θ 2 2 σ 2 e − i θ 3 2 σ 3 = e − i θ 2 ( n ⋅ σ ) e^{-i{\theta_1\over2} \sigma_1} e^{-i{\theta_2\over2} \sigma_2} e^{-i{\theta_3\over2} \sigma_3}
= e^{-i {\theta\over2}\left({\bf n}\cdot {\bf\sigma} \right)} e − i 2 θ 1 σ 1 e − i 2 θ 2 σ 2 e − i 2 θ 3 σ 3 = e − i 2 θ ( n ⋅ σ ) We will do this by expanding both the Left-Hand Side (LHS) and the Right-Hand Side (RHS) of the equation and then comparing the resulting expressions.
Key Identities ¶ The proof relies on two main properties of Pauli matrices (σ1,σ2,σ3):
Euler’s Identity for Pauli Matrices: For any unit vector v and angle α, the exponential is given by:
e − i α 2 ( v ⋅ σ ) = cos ( α 2 ) I − i sin ( α 2 ) ( v ⋅ σ ) e^{-i {\alpha\over2}\left({\bf v}\cdot {\bf\sigma} \right)} = \cos\left({\alpha\over 2}\right)I - i \sin\left({\alpha\over2}\right) \left({\bf v}\cdot {\bf\sigma} \right) e − i 2 α ( v ⋅ σ ) = cos ( 2 α ) I − i sin ( 2 α ) ( v ⋅ σ ) where I I I is the 2x2 identity matrix.
Pauli Matrix Algebra:
σ k 2 = I \sigma_k^2 = I σ k 2 = I for k = 1 , 2 , 3 k=1, 2, 3 k = 1 , 2 , 3
σ i σ j = i ϵ i j k σ k \sigma_i \sigma_j = i \epsilon_{ijk} \sigma_k σ i σ j = i ϵ ijk σ k for i ≠ j i \neq j i = j (e.g., σ 1 σ 2 = i σ 3 \sigma_1\sigma_2 = i\sigma_3 σ 1 σ 2 = i σ 3 , σ 2 σ 3 = i σ 1 \sigma_2\sigma_3 = i\sigma_1 σ 2 σ 3 = i σ 1 , σ 3 σ 1 = i σ 2 \sigma_3\sigma_1 = i\sigma_2 σ 3 σ 1 = i σ 2 )
σ i σ j = − σ j σ i \sigma_i \sigma_j = -\sigma_j \sigma_i σ i σ j = − σ j σ i for i ≠ j i \neq j i = j
For notational simplicity, we will use c k = cos ( θ k / 2 ) c_k = \cos(\theta_k/2) c k = cos ( θ k /2 ) and s k = sin ( θ k / 2 ) s_k = \sin(\theta_k/2) s k = sin ( θ k /2 ) .
Step 1: Expand the Left-Hand Side (LHS) ¶ We start by expanding each factor on the LHS:
e − i θ 1 2 σ 1 = c 1 I − i s 1 σ 1 e^{-i{\theta_1\over2} \sigma_1} = c_1 I - i s_1 \sigma_1 e − i 2 θ 1 σ 1 = c 1 I − i s 1 σ 1
e − i θ 2 2 σ 2 = c 2 I − i s 2 σ 2 e^{-i{\theta_2\over2} \sigma_2} = c_2 I - i s_2 \sigma_2 e − i 2 θ 2 σ 2 = c 2 I − i s 2 σ 2
e − i θ 3 2 σ 3 = c 3 I − i s 3 σ 3 e^{-i{\theta_3\over2} \sigma_3} = c_3 I - i s_3 \sigma_3 e − i 2 θ 3 σ 3 = c 3 I − i s 3 σ 3
First, let’s multiply the first two terms:
( c 1 I − i s 1 σ 1 ) ( c 2 I − i s 2 σ 2 ) = c 1 c 2 I − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − s 1 s 2 σ 1 σ 2 (c_1 I - i s_1 \sigma_1)(c_2 I - i s_2 \sigma_2) = c_1 c_2 I - i c_1 s_2 \sigma_2 - i s_1 c_2 \sigma_1 - s_1 s_2 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 ( c 1 I − i s 1 σ 1 ) ( c 2 I − i s 2 σ 2 ) = c 1 c 2 I − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − s 1 s 2 σ 1 σ 2 Using the property σ 1 σ 2 = i σ 3 \sigma_1 \sigma_2 = i\sigma_3 σ 1 σ 2 = i σ 3 , this becomes:
c 1 c 2 I − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − s 1 s 2 ( i σ 3 ) = c 1 c 2 I − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − i s 1 s 2 σ 3 c_1 c_2 I - i s_1 c_2 \sigma_1 - i c_1 s_2 \sigma_2 - s_1 s_2 (i\sigma_3) = c_1 c_2 I - i s_1 c_2 \sigma_1 - i c_1 s_2 \sigma_2 - i s_1 s_2 \sigma_3 c 1 c 2 I − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − s 1 s 2 ( i σ 3 ) = c 1 c 2 I − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − i s 1 s 2 σ 3 Next, we multiply this result by the third term, ( c 3 I − i s 3 σ 3 ) (c_3 I - i s_3 \sigma_3) ( c 3 I − i s 3 σ 3 ) :
( c 1 c 2 I − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − i s 1 s 2 σ 3 ) ( c 3 I − i s 3 σ 3 ) (c_1 c_2 I - i s_1 c_2 \sigma_1 - i c_1 s_2 \sigma_2 - i s_1 s_2 \sigma_3)(c_3 I - i s_3 \sigma_3) ( c 1 c 2 I − i s 1 c 2 σ 1 − i c 1 s 2 σ 2 − i s 1 s 2 σ 3 ) ( c 3 I − i s 3 σ 3 ) Expanding this product term−by−term gives:
c 1 c 2 c 3 I − i c 1 c 2 s 3 σ 3 − i s 1 c 2 c 3 σ 1 − s 1 c 2 s 3 σ 1 σ 3 − i c 1 s 2 c 3 σ 2 − c 1 s 2 s 3 σ 2 σ 3 − i s 1 s 2 c 3 σ 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 σ 3 2 c_1 c_2 c_3 I - i c_1 c_2 s_3 \sigma_3 - i s_1 c_2 c_3 \sigma_1 - s_1 c_2 s_3 \sigma_1 \sigma_3 - i c_1 s_2 c_3 \sigma_2 - c_1 s_2 s_3 \sigma_2 \sigma_3 - i s_1 s_2 c_3 \sigma_3 - s_1 s_2 s_3 \sigma_3^2 c 1 c 2 c 3 I − i c 1 c 2 s 3 σ 3 − i s 1 c 2 c 3 σ 1 − s 1 c 2 s 3 σ 1 σ 3 − i c 1 s 2 c 3 σ 2 − c 1 s 2 s 3 σ 2 σ 3 − i s 1 s 2 c 3 σ 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 σ 3 2 Now we use the Pauli algebra rules to simplify the products:
σ 1 σ 3 = − i σ 2 \sigma_1 \sigma_3 = -i\sigma_2 σ 1 σ 3 = − i σ 2
σ 2 σ 3 = i σ 1 \sigma_2 \sigma_3 = i\sigma_1 σ 2 σ 3 = i σ 1
σ 3 2 = I \sigma_3^2 = I σ 3 2 = I
Substituting these into our expression:
c 1 c 2 c 3 I − i c 1 c 2 s 3 σ 3 − i s 1 c 2 c 3 σ 1 − s 1 c 2 s 3 ( − i σ 2 ) − i c 1 s 2 c 3 σ 2 − c 1 s 2 s 3 ( i σ 1 ) − i s 1 s 2 c 3 σ 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 I c_1 c_2 c_3 I - i c_1 c_2 s_3 \sigma_3 - i s_1 c_2 c_3 \sigma_1 - s_1 c_2 s_3 (-i\sigma_2) - i c_1 s_2 c_3 \sigma_2 - c_1 s_2 s_3 (i\sigma_1) - i s_1 s_2 c_3 \sigma_3 - s_1 s_2 s_3 I c 1 c 2 c 3 I − i c 1 c 2 s 3 σ 3 − i s 1 c 2 c 3 σ 1 − s 1 c 2 s 3 ( − i σ 2 ) − i c 1 s 2 c 3 σ 2 − c 1 s 2 s 3 ( i σ 1 ) − i s 1 s 2 c 3 σ 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 I Finally, we group the coefficients for the identity matrix I I I and each Pauli matrix σ k \sigma_k σ k :
Coefficient of I I I : c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 c_1 c_2 c_3 - s_1 s_2 s_3 c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3
Coefficient of σ 1 \sigma_1 σ 1 : − i s 1 c 2 c 3 − i c 1 s 2 s 3 = − i ( s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3 ) - i s_1 c_2 c_3 - i c_1 s_2 s_3 = -i(s_1 c_2 c_3 + c_1 s_2 s_3) − i s 1 c 2 c 3 − i c 1 s 2 s 3 = − i ( s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3 )
Coefficient of σ 2 \sigma_2 σ 2 : + i s 1 c 2 s 3 − i c 1 s 2 c 3 = − i ( c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3 ) + i s_1 c_2 s_3 - i c_1 s_2 c_3 = -i(c_1 s_2 c_3 - s_1 c_2 s_3) + i s 1 c 2 s 3 − i c 1 s 2 c 3 = − i ( c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3 )
Coefficient of σ 3 \sigma_3 σ 3 : − i c 1 c 2 s 3 − i s 1 s 2 c 3 = − i ( c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3 ) - i c_1 c_2 s_3 - i s_1 s_2 c_3 = -i(c_1 c_2 s_3 + s_1 s_2 c_3) − i c 1 c 2 s 3 − i s 1 s 2 c 3 = − i ( c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3 )
So, the fully expanded LHS is:
LHS = ( c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 ) I − i [ ( s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3 ) σ 1 + ( c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3 ) σ 2 + ( c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3 ) σ 3 ] \text{LHS} = (c_1 c_2 c_3 - s_1 s_2 s_3)I - i \left[ (s_1 c_2 c_3 + c_1 s_2 s_3)\sigma_1 + (c_1 s_2 c_3 - s_1 c_2 s_3)\sigma_2 + (c_1 c_2 s_3 + s_1 s_2 c_3)\sigma_3 \right] LHS = ( c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 ) I − i [ ( s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3 ) σ 1 + ( c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3 ) σ 2 + ( c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3 ) σ 3 ] Step 2: Expand the Right-Hand Side (RHS) ¶ The RHS is e − i θ 2 ( n ⋅ σ ) e^{-i {\theta\over2}\left({\bf n}\cdot {\bf\sigma} \right)} e − i 2 θ ( n ⋅ σ ) . Using Euler’s identity for Pauli matrices, this expands to:
RHS = cos ( θ 2 ) I − i sin ( θ 2 ) ( n ⋅ σ ) \text{RHS} = \cos\left({\theta\over 2}\right)I - i \sin\left({\theta\over2}\right) \left({\bf n}\cdot {\bf\sigma} \right) RHS = cos ( 2 θ ) I − i sin ( 2 θ ) ( n ⋅ σ ) where n = ( n 1 , n 2 , n 3 ) \mathbf{n} = (n_1, n_2, n_3) n = ( n 1 , n 2 , n 3 ) is a unit vector. Expanding the dot product n ⋅ σ = n 1 σ 1 + n 2 σ 2 + n 3 σ 3 {\bf n}\cdot {\bf\sigma} = n_1\sigma_1 + n_2\sigma_2 + n_3\sigma_3 n ⋅ σ = n 1 σ 1 + n 2 σ 2 + n 3 σ 3 , we get:
RHS = cos ( θ 2 ) I − i sin ( θ 2 ) ( n 1 σ 1 + n 2 σ 2 + n 3 σ 3 ) \text{RHS} = \cos\left({\theta\over 2}\right)I - i \sin\left({\theta\over2}\right)(n_1\sigma_1 + n_2\sigma_2 + n_3\sigma_3) RHS = cos ( 2 θ ) I − i sin ( 2 θ ) ( n 1 σ 1 + n 2 σ 2 + n 3 σ 3 ) Step 3: Equate LHS and RHS and Verify ¶ For the LHS and RHS to be equal, the coefficients of the identity matrix I I I and each Pauli matrix σ k \sigma_k σ k must be equal, as these matrices are linearly independent.
Let’s define the scalar coefficients derived from the LHS:
C 0 = c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 C_0 = c_1 c_2 c_3 - s_1 s_2 s_3 C 0 = c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3
C 1 = s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3 C_1 = s_1 c_2 c_3 + c_1 s_2 s_3 C 1 = s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3
C 2 = c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3 C_2 = c_1 s_2 c_3 - s_1 c_2 s_3 C 2 = c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3
C 3 = c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3 C_3 = c_1 c_2 s_3 + s_1 s_2 c_3 C 3 = c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3
Comparing the LHS expression with the RHS, we find the following relations:
cos ( θ 2 ) = C 0 \cos(\frac{\theta}{2}) = C_0 cos ( 2 θ ) = C 0
sin ( θ 2 ) n 1 = C 1 \sin(\frac{\theta}{2}) n_1 = C_1 sin ( 2 θ ) n 1 = C 1
sin ( θ 2 ) n 2 = C 2 \sin(\frac{\theta}{2}) n_2 = C_2 sin ( 2 θ ) n 2 = C 2
sin ( θ 2 ) n 3 = C 3 \sin(\frac{\theta}{2}) n_3 = C_3 sin ( 2 θ ) n 3 = C 3
To confirm that these relations are always valid, we must show that they satisfy the fundamental trigonometric identity cos 2 ( α ) + sin 2 ( α ) = 1 \cos^2(\alpha) + \sin^2(\alpha) = 1 cos 2 ( α ) + sin 2 ( α ) = 1 . Given that n \bf n n is a unit vector (n 1 2 + n 2 2 + n 3 2 = 1 n_1^2+n_2^2+n_3^2=1 n 1 2 + n 2 2 + n 3 2 = 1 ), we need to prove that C 0 2 + C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2 = 1 C_0^2 + C_1^2 + C_2^2 + C_3^2 = 1 C 0 2 + C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2 = 1 .
Let’s compute the sum of the squares of the coefficients:
C 0 2 = ( c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 ) 2 = c 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 − 2 c 1 c 2 c 3 s 1 s 2 s 3 + s 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2 C_0^2 = (c_1 c_2 c_3 - s_1 s_2 s_3)^2 = c_1^2 c_2^2 c_3^2 - 2c_1c_2c_3s_1s_2s_3 + s_1^2 s_2^2 s_3^2 C 0 2 = ( c 1 c 2 c 3 − s 1 s 2 s 3 ) 2 = c 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 − 2 c 1 c 2 c 3 s 1 s 2 s 3 + s 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2
C 1 2 = ( s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3 ) 2 = s 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 + 2 s 1 c 1 c 2 c 3 s 2 s 3 + c 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2 C_1^2 = (s_1 c_2 c_3 + c_1 s_2 s_3)^2 = s_1^2 c_2^2 c_3^2 + 2s_1c_1c_2c_3s_2s_3 + c_1^2 s_2^2 s_3^2 C 1 2 = ( s 1 c 2 c 3 + c 1 s 2 s 3 ) 2 = s 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 + 2 s 1 c 1 c 2 c 3 s 2 s 3 + c 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2
C 2 2 = ( c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3 ) 2 = c 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2 − 2 c 1 s 1 c 2 s 2 c 3 s 3 + s 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2 C_2^2 = (c_1 s_2 c_3 - s_1 c_2 s_3)^2 = c_1^2 s_2^2 c_3^2 - 2c_1s_1c_2s_2c_3s_3 + s_1^2 c_2^2 s_3^2 C 2 2 = ( c 1 s 2 c 3 − s 1 c 2 s 3 ) 2 = c 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2 − 2 c 1 s 1 c 2 s 2 c 3 s 3 + s 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2
C 3 2 = ( c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3 ) 2 = c 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2 + 2 c 1 s 1 c 2 c 3 s 2 s 3 + s 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2 C_3^2 = (c_1 c_2 s_3 + s_1 s_2 c_3)^2 = c_1^2 c_2^2 s_3^2 + 2c_1s_1c_2c_3s_2s_3 + s_1^2 s_2^2 c_3^2 C 3 2 = ( c 1 c 2 s 3 + s 1 s 2 c 3 ) 2 = c 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2 + 2 c 1 s 1 c 2 c 3 s 2 s 3 + s 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2
Summing these four equations, the cross-product terms (2 c 1 s 1 c 2 s 2 c 3 s 3 2c_1s_1c_2s_2c_3s_3 2 c 1 s 1 c 2 s 2 c 3 s 3 ) cancel each other out. The remaining terms are:
C 0 2 + C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2 = ( c 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 + s 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 ) + ( c 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2 + s 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2 ) + ( c 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2 + s 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2 ) + ( c 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2 + s 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2 ) C_0^2 + C_1^2 + C_2^2 + C_3^2 = (c_1^2 c_2^2 c_3^2 + s_1^2 c_2^2 c_3^2) + (c_1^2 s_2^2 c_3^2 + s_1^2 s_2^2 c_3^2) + (c_1^2 c_2^2 s_3^2 + s_1^2 c_2^2 s_3^2) + (c_1^2 s_2^2 s_3^2 + s_1^2 s_2^2 s_3^2) C 0 2 + C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2 = ( c 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 + s 1 2 c 2 2 c 3 2 ) + ( c 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2 + s 1 2 s 2 2 c 3 2 ) + ( c 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2 + s 1 2 c 2 2 s 3 2 ) + ( c 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2 + s 1 2 s 2 2 s 3 2 ) Now,we can factor these terms:
c 2 2 c 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) + s 2 2 c 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) + c 2 2 s 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) + s 2 2 s 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) c_2^2 c_3^2(c_1^2+s_1^2) + s_2^2 c_3^2(c_1^2+s_1^2) + c_2^2 s_3^2(c_1^2+s_1^2) + s_2^2 s_3^2(c_1^2+s_1^2) c 2 2 c 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) + s 2 2 c 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) + c 2 2 s 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) + s 2 2 s 3 2 ( c 1 2 + s 1 2 ) Since c 1 2 + s 1 2 = cos 2 ( θ 1 / 2 ) + sin 2 ( θ 1 / 2 ) = 1 c_1^2+s_1^2 = \cos^2(\theta_1/2)+\sin^2(\theta_1/2) = 1 c 1 2 + s 1 2 = cos 2 ( θ 1 /2 ) + sin 2 ( θ 1 /2 ) = 1 , this simplifies to:
c 2 2 c 3 2 + s 2 2 c 3 2 + c 2 2 s 3 2 + s 2 2 s 3 2 c_2^2 c_3^2 + s_2^2 c_3^2 + c_2^2 s_3^2 + s_2^2 s_3^2 c 2 2 c 3 2 + s 2 2 c 3 2 + c 2 2 s 3 2 + s 2 2 s 3 2 Factoring again:
c 3 2 ( c 2 2 + s 2 2 ) + s 3 2 ( c 2 2 + s 2 2 ) c_3^2(c_2^2+s_2^2) + s_3^2(c_2^2+s_2^2) c 3 2 ( c 2 2 + s 2 2 ) + s 3 2 ( c 2 2 + s 2 2 ) Using c 2 2 + s 2 2 = 1 c_2^2+s_2^2 = 1 c 2 2 + s 2 2 = 1 , we get:
c 3 2 ( 1 ) + s 3 2 ( 1 ) = c 3 2 + s 3 2 = 1 c_3^2(1) + s_3^2(1) = c_3^2 + s_3^2 = 1 c 3 2 ( 1 ) + s 3 2 ( 1 ) = c 3 2 + s 3 2 = 1 Conclusion ¶ We have shown that the coefficients derived from expanding the LHS satisfy the condition C 0 2 + C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2 = 1 C_0^2 + C_1^2 + C_2^2 + C_3^2 = 1 C 0 2 + C 1 2 + C 2 2 + C 3 2 = 1 . This proves that the product of the three exponential matrices is indeed another exponential matrix of the same form.
We have constructively found the parameters for the equivalent single rotation:
cos ( θ 2 ) = cos ( θ 1 2 ) cos ( θ 2 2 ) cos ( θ 3 2 ) − sin ( θ 1 2 ) sin ( θ 2 2 ) sin ( θ 3 2 ) \cos\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) = \cos\left(\frac{\theta_1}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{\theta_2}{2}\right)\cos\left(\frac{\theta_3}{2}\right) - \sin\left(\frac{\theta_1}{2}\right)\sin\left(\frac{\theta_2}{2}\right)\sin\left(\frac{\theta_3}{2}\right) cos ( 2 θ ) = cos ( 2 θ 1 ) cos ( 2 θ 2 ) cos ( 2 θ 3 ) − sin ( 2 θ 1 ) sin ( 2 θ 2 ) sin ( 2 θ 3 ) The axis of rotation n = ( n 1 , n 2 , n 3 ) \mathbf{n} = (n_1, n_2, n_3) n = ( n 1 , n 2 , n 3 ) is determined by:
sin ( θ 2 ) n = ( sin ( θ 1 2 ) cos ( θ 2 2 ) cos ( θ 3 2 ) + cos ( θ 1 2 ) sin ( θ 2 2 ) sin ( θ 3 2 ) cos ( θ 1 2 ) sin ( θ 2 2 ) cos ( θ 3 2 ) − sin ( θ 1 2 ) cos ( θ 2 2 ) sin ( θ 3 2 ) cos ( θ 1 2 ) cos ( θ 2 2 ) sin ( θ 3 2 ) + sin ( θ 1 2 ) sin ( θ 2 2 ) cos ( θ 3 2 ) ) \sin\left(\frac{\theta}{2}\right) \mathbf{n}
= \begin{pmatrix}
\sin(\frac{\theta_1}{2})\cos(\frac{\theta_2}{2})\cos(\frac{\theta_3}{2}) + \cos(\frac{\theta_1}{2})\sin(\frac{\theta_2}{2})\sin(\frac{\theta_3}{2}) \\
\cos(\frac{\theta_1}{2})\sin(\frac{\theta_2}{2})\cos(\frac{\theta_3}{2}) - \sin(\frac{\theta_1}{2})\cos(\frac{\theta_2}{2})\sin(\frac{\theta_3}{2}) \\
\cos(\frac{\theta_1}{2})\cos(\frac{\theta_2}{2})\sin(\frac{\theta_3}{2}) + \sin(\frac{\theta_1}{2})\sin(\frac{\theta_2}{2})\cos(\frac{\theta_3}{2}) \end{pmatrix} sin ( 2 θ ) n = ⎝ ⎛ sin ( 2 θ 1 ) cos ( 2 θ 2 ) cos ( 2 θ 3 ) + cos ( 2 θ 1 ) sin ( 2 θ 2 ) sin ( 2 θ 3 ) cos ( 2 θ 1 ) sin ( 2 θ 2 ) cos ( 2 θ 3 ) − sin ( 2 θ 1 ) cos ( 2 θ 2 ) sin ( 2 θ 3 ) cos ( 2 θ 1 ) cos ( 2 θ 2 ) sin ( 2 θ 3 ) + sin ( 2 θ 1 ) sin ( 2 θ 2 ) cos ( 2 θ 3 ) ⎠ ⎞ This completes the constructive proof.